| Unbroken aluminum frame | Aluminum alloy | Approximately 205 W/m·K | 0 mm | Approximately 5.0–6.0 W/m²·K | Baseline: highest heat transfer | High, especially in cold weather and at metal-to-glass junctions | Generally unsuitable where year-round heating or cooling is required |
| Basic polyamide thermal-break frame | Aluminum exterior and interior sections separated by reinforced polyamide | Aluminum: approximately 205; polyamide: approximately 0.25 W/m·K | 18–24 mm | Approximately 2.2–3.0 W/m²·K | About 45–60% lower conductive heat flow | Moderate to low when drainage, gaskets, and installation are correctly designed | Suitable for mild-to-moderate climates and seasonal use |
| Enhanced polyamide thermal-break frame | Aluminum sections with a wider, reinforced polyamide barrier | Aluminum: approximately 205; polyamide: approximately 0.25 W/m·K | 30–34 mm | Approximately 1.6–2.2 W/m²·K | About 60–70% lower conductive heat flow | Low when interior surface temperatures remain above the room-air dew point | A strong general-purpose choice for conditioned sun rooms |
| High-performance multi-chamber frame | Thermally broken aluminum with multiple insulating chambers and optimized seals | Aluminum: approximately 205; insulating zones typically much lower than aluminum | 34–45 mm | Approximately 1.2–1.8 W/m²·K | About 70–80% lower conductive heat flow | Low, provided the glazing edge, spacers, and installation are also thermally optimized | Best option for cold climates, extended occupancy, and low-energy designs |
| Thermally broken frame with insulated glazing | Thermally broken aluminum combined with double or triple insulating glass | Frame: low-conductivity barrier zones; glass center-pane conductivity varies by gas and coating | 30–45 mm | Frame: approximately 1.2–2.2 W/m²·K | Frame improvement must be combined with low-U glazing for whole-window gains | Low when warm-edge spacers and continuous perimeter seals are used | Most balanced configuration for year-round comfort and energy efficiency |